2022 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport vs 2021 Honda CR-V
Overview | |
MSRP$25,350 | MSRP$21,445 |
Average price$26,018 | Average price$18,841 |
Listings1877 | Listings223 |
Ratings & Reviews | |
User Reviews | User Reviews |
Expert reviews7.8 out of 10 | Expert reviews |
Pros
| |
2021 Honda CR-V Reviews SummaryEven in a grim year, Honda is selling a staggering number of CR-Vs. The CR-V is the best-selling Honda by far. It’s also the second best-selling compact SUV, just behind the Toyota RAV4. And it's the fifth best-selling vehicle in the U.S., and if you take out all the commercial sales of full-size pickups it’s one of the two best-selling vehicles year in and year out. So it’s hard to argue against the CR-V formula. Honda’s been at this almost as long as crossovers have been a thing, launching the CR-V in 1997—a year after the RAV4 debuted. The funny thing is, aside from sales volume, there’s only one thing the CR-V particularly excels at. Aesthetics are subjective, but it would be hard to argue the CR-V is the best looking vehicle in its class. It’s not the cheapest. It’s not the best equipped, especially at the middle to lower trim levels. It’s not the fastest, nor is it the quietest, or the most fuel efficient. It’s not even the most reliable, showing up nowhere in J.D. Power's Most Reliable list. So what makes it so appealing to American consumers? Let’s see if we can figure that out. | |
2022 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport Reviews Summary | |
No video found | No video found |
Popular Features & Specs | |
Engine1.5L 190 hp I4 | Engine2.0L 148 hp I4 |
Drive TrainFWD | Drive TrainFWD |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity5 |
Horsepower190 hp @ 5600 rpm | Horsepower148 hp @ 6000 rpm |
MPG City28 | MPG City24 |
MPG Highway34 | MPG Highway30 |
Engine | |
Engine Name1.5L 190 hp I4 | Engine Name2.0L 148 hp I4 |
Torque179 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm | Torque145 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm |
Horsepower190 hp @ 5600 rpm | Horsepower148 hp @ 6000 rpm |
DrivetrainFWD | DrivetrainFWD |
Fuel Economy | |
MPG City28 | MPG City24 |
MPG Highway34 | MPG Highway30 |
Interior | |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity5 |
Safety | |
Front Crash Overall5 | Front Crash Overall4 |
Side Crash Overall5 | Side Crash Overall5 |
Dimensions & Capacity | |
Cargo Space39.2 cu ft | Cargo Space21.7 cu ft |
Curb Weight3337 lbs | Curb Weight3120 lbs |
Height66.1 in | Height64.8 in |
Length182.1 in | Length171.9 in |
Width73.0 in | Width71.3 in |
Wheelbase104.8 in | Wheelbase105.1 in |
Maximum Payload1358 lbs | Maximum Payload1223 lbs |
Number of doors4 | Number of doors4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity1500 lbs | Maximum Towing Capacity |
Overview | ||
MSRP | $25,350 | $21,445 |
Average price | $26,018 | $18,841 |
Listings | ||
Ratings & Reviews | ||
User reviews | ||
Expert reviews | 7.8 out of 10Read full review | |
Pros & cons | Pros
| |
Summary | Even in a grim year, Honda is selling a staggering number of CR-Vs. The CR-V is the best-selling Honda by far. It’s also the second best-selling compact SUV, just behind the Toyota RAV4. And it's the fifth best-selling vehicle in the U.S., and if you take out all the commercial sales of full-size pickups it’s one of the two best-selling vehicles year in and year out. So it’s hard to argue against the CR-V formula. Honda’s been at this almost as long as crossovers have been a thing, launching the CR-V in 1997—a year after the RAV4 debuted. The funny thing is, aside from sales volume, there’s only one thing the CR-V particularly excels at. Aesthetics are subjective, but it would be hard to argue the CR-V is the best looking vehicle in its class. It’s not the cheapest. It’s not the best equipped, especially at the middle to lower trim levels. It’s not the fastest, nor is it the quietest, or the most fuel efficient. It’s not even the most reliable, showing up nowhere in J.D. Power's Most Reliable list. So what makes it so appealing to American consumers? Let’s see if we can figure that out. | |
Video | No video found | No video found |
Popular Features & Specs | ||
Engine | 1.5L 190 hp I4 | 2.0L 148 hp I4 |
Drive Train | FWD | FWD |
Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
Horsepower | 190 hp @ 5600 rpm | 148 hp @ 6000 rpm |
MPG City | 28 | 24 |
MPG Highway | 34 | 30 |
Engine | ||
Engine Name | 1.5L 190 hp I4 | 2.0L 148 hp I4 |
Torque | 179 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm | 145 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm |
Horsepower | 190 hp @ 5600 rpm | 148 hp @ 6000 rpm |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
Fuel Economy | ||
MPG City | 28 | 24 |
MPG Highway | 34 | 30 |
Interior | ||
Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
Safety | ||
Front Crash Overall | 5 | 4 |
Side Crash Overall | 5 | 5 |
Dimensions & Capacity | ||
Cargo Space | 39.2 cu ft | 21.7 cu ft |
Curb Weight | 3337 lbs | 3120 lbs |
Height | 66.1 in | 64.8 in |
Length | 182.1 in | 171.9 in |
Width | 73.0 in | 71.3 in |
Wheelbase | 104.8 in | 105.1 in |
Maximum Payload | 1358 lbs | 1223 lbs |
Number of doors | 4 | 4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity | 1500 lbs | |
By: CarGurus + AI
At CarGurus, our team of experienced automotive writers remain at the heart of our content operation, conducting hands-on car tests and writing insightful guides that are backed by years of industry experience. To complement this, we are harnessing AI to make our content offering more diverse and more helpful to shoppers than ever. To achieve this, our AI systems are based exclusively on CarGurus content, ratings and data, so that what we produce is both unique to CarGurus, and uniquely helpful to car shoppers.