1965 GT?

Asked by Belvedere_639 May 18, 2011 at 12:56 AM about the 1965 Ford Mustang Coupe RWD

Question type: Shopping & Pricing

I am looking at 1965 Mustang claimed to be a GT. The exhuast does not have trumpet tips through the rear valance and there are no GT tags.  However, the fog lights, dash, disc brakes w/brake pedal point to a GT.  I read a couple of years ago that Ford made some of these Mustangs prior to marking them as GT's early in the 1965 production year; which it is not officially a GT, but has nearly all of the specifications as one.  Is actually true?  This is the second 1965 I have looked at this way.

7 Answers

The GT was available in 1965, it has either an A or a K for the 5th vin digit. The fact it is missing the trumpet tips points to it not being a GT, but given the age of the vehicle the only true indicator to go by is the vin.

5

Thanks Jeff, the car has an A code engine. I wish I had printed what I read a couople of years ago when I looked at the other Mustang. Here is what I remember, the GT began production in Feb 65 and available in Apr. However, some Mustangs prodeuced prior to that date, Ford incorporated some of the GT aspects into a regular mustang, ie....disc brakes, new dash. This car, like the other one, has the Mustang letters on the front fenders but not the GT emblem and NO pony emblem, which Ford removed and placed the GT emblem.

255

Back in the day you had to order EVERYTHING that wasn't standard, EXTRA. Power steering, brakes, air conditioning, stripe or pinstripe package, etc. If it wasn't sold as a GT, it wasn't and isn't a GT. You had to purchase a GT model. I owned a 1966 coupe that had all GT options, EXCEPT the GT package. Wasn't a GT. It had to have the 271 HP engine. Mine was the usual 200 HP. The VIN number can be read to id what the car was originally.

2 people found this helpful.
5

Thanks Elizabeth. The guy tried to sell the car as a GT, but it was not a factory GT. It did have some of the GT "pieces", disc brakes, A code engine, lower MUSTANG lettering....it just was not a true GT. I knew all of these things, but wanted some confirmation from some others. I gave up when he would give me the trim information from the tag so I could determine the manufacuring date. When I tell people that they do not have a GT but some components of a GT, they do not believe me. Thanks again.

175

GT's could be ordered beginning March 15th 1965... That is also when Ford came out with a price change; I know because I ordered one on the 13th was called back into the office at Mel Burns Ford Inc to redo order form as I had ordered all the performance options including Limited Slip & K-engine. The GT package was less expensive than the options separate; the car's delivery would not be before April 17th. I was there and had one of the first in my neighborhood. it had a manufacture date of March 26th. I held onto my Invoice--glad I did; without that, it's impossible to say for certain if you have a "Factory GT"

Your Answer:

Mustang

Looking for a Used Mustang in your area?

CarGurus has 19,852 nationwide Mustang listings starting at $1,950.

ZIP:

Own this car?

Share your experience with others.

1965 Ford Mustang

Review another car

CarGurus Experts

  • #1
    Gene Arnett
    Reputation
    3,160
  • #2
    Bob Beaman
    Reputation
    2,690
  • #3
    rst429
    Reputation
    2,640
View All

Know more, shop wisely

Search

Related Models For Sale

Used Chevrolet Corvette
793 Great Deals out of 14,532 listings starting at $4,999
Used Dodge Charger
819 Great Deals out of 14,534 listings starting at $2,500

Used Cars for Sale

2024 Ford Mustang For Sale
99 Great Deals out of 7,395 listings starting at $24,890
2023 Ford Mustang For Sale
38 Great Deals out of 561 listings starting at $20,900
2022 Ford Mustang For Sale
86 Great Deals out of 1,130 listings starting at $14,418
2021 Ford Mustang For Sale
81 Great Deals out of 1,009 listings starting at $16,899
2020 Ford Mustang For Sale
84 Great Deals out of 972 listings starting at $14,326

Content submitted by Users is not endorsed by CarGurus, does not express the opinions of CarGurus, and should not be considered reviewed, screened, or approved by CarGurus. Please refer to CarGurus Terms of Use. Content will be removed if CarGurus becomes aware that it violates our policies.