Cadillac XT5 vs Acura MDX
Overview | |
Years produced2001-2020 | Years produced2017-Present |
MSRP$51,200 | MSRP$44,195 |
Average price$29,630 | Average price$28,188 |
Listings9145 | Listings9637 |
Ratings & Reviews | |
User Reviews | User Reviews |
Expert reviews7.8 out of 10 | Expert reviews6.3 out of 10 |
Pros
| Pros
|
Reviews SummaryPeople want stylish, reliable, and safe vehicles equipped with simple controls, intuitive technology, and enjoyable driving dynamics. Of course, value is a part of that equation, particularly when it comes to fuel economy. We’re happy to report the refreshed 2025 Acura MDX meets nearly all of those requirements. Furthermore, Acura has apparently gotten the user-experience and user-interface message loud and clear, as the changes to the 2025 MDX reflect a shift to simplicity, sophistication, and refinement. Verdict: This year’s updates make the 2025 Acura MDX more appealing than ever. However, this is not a fuel-efficient choice and the standard V6 engine is somewhat underwhelming. Acura needs to install a hybrid or plug-in hybrid in the MDX as soon as possible if it wants to woo customers shopping in this segment. | |
Reviews SummaryThe Cadillac XT5 offers plenty of the luxury experience for less money and fuss than some of its competitors. Even so, this SUV lacks the driving excitement and engagement that the Europeans offer, and it can’t match the style and tech of the Korean and Japanese brands. If it were our only choice, there’d be little to complain about, but when there are so many other great options in the same segment—including the Lincoln Nautilus, BMW X3, Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class, Genesis GV70, and Porsche Macan—the Cadillac loses some of its shine. | |
No video found | |
Popular Features & Specs | |
Engine | Engine2.0L 235 hp I4 |
Drive Train | Drive TrainFWD |
Seating Capacity7 | Seating Capacity5 |
Horsepower | Horsepower235 hp @ 5000 rpm |
MPG City | MPG City22 |
MPG Highway | MPG Highway29 |
Engine | |
Engine Name3.5L 290 hp V6 | Engine Name2.0L 235 hp I4 |
Torque267 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm | Torque258 lb-ft @ 1500 rpm |
Horsepower290 hp @ 6200 rpm | Horsepower235 hp @ 5000 rpm |
DrivetrainFWD | DrivetrainFWD |
Fuel Economy | |
MPG City | MPG City22 |
MPG Highway | MPG Highway29 |
Interior | |
Seating Capacity7 | Seating Capacity5 |
Key Features | |
Navigation SystemStandard | Navigation System |
Sunroof/MoonroofStandard | Sunroof/Moonroof |
Safety | |
Front Crash Overall4 | Front Crash Overall5 |
Side Crash Overall5 | Side Crash Overall5 |
Dimensions & Capacity | |
Cargo Space16.3 cu ft | Cargo Space30.0 cu ft |
Curb Weight4268 lbs | Curb Weight3915 lbs |
Height67.9 in | Height66.1 in |
Length198.4 in | Length189.6 in |
Width78.7 in | Width74.9 in |
Wheelbase113.8 in | Wheelbase112.5 in |
Maximum Payload1173 lbs | Maximum Payload2086 lbs |
Number of doors4 | Number of doors4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity3500 lbs | Maximum Towing Capacity1000 lbs |
Overview | ||
Years produced | 2001-2020 | 2017-Present |
MSRP | $51,200 | $44,195 |
Average price | $29,630 | $28,188 |
Listings | ||
Ratings & Reviews | ||
User reviews | ||
Expert reviews | 7.8 out of 10Read full review | 6.3 out of 10Read full review |
Pros & cons | Pros
| Pros
|
Summary | People want stylish, reliable, and safe vehicles equipped with simple controls, intuitive technology, and enjoyable driving dynamics. Of course, value is a part of that equation, particularly when it comes to fuel economy. We’re happy to report the refreshed 2025 Acura MDX meets nearly all of those requirements. Furthermore, Acura has apparently gotten the user-experience and user-interface message loud and clear, as the changes to the 2025 MDX reflect a shift to simplicity, sophistication, and refinement. Verdict: This year’s updates make the 2025 Acura MDX more appealing than ever. However, this is not a fuel-efficient choice and the standard V6 engine is somewhat underwhelming. Acura needs to install a hybrid or plug-in hybrid in the MDX as soon as possible if it wants to woo customers shopping in this segment. | The Cadillac XT5 offers plenty of the luxury experience for less money and fuss than some of its competitors. Even so, this SUV lacks the driving excitement and engagement that the Europeans offer, and it can’t match the style and tech of the Korean and Japanese brands. If it were our only choice, there’d be little to complain about, but when there are so many other great options in the same segment—including the Lincoln Nautilus, BMW X3, Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class, Genesis GV70, and Porsche Macan—the Cadillac loses some of its shine. |
Video | No video found | |
Popular Features & Specs | ||
Engine | 2.0L 235 hp I4 | |
Drive Train | FWD | |
Seating Capacity | 7 | 5 |
Horsepower | 235 hp @ 5000 rpm | |
MPG City | 22 | |
MPG Highway | 29 | |
Engine | ||
Engine Name | 3.5L 290 hp V6 | 2.0L 235 hp I4 |
Torque | 267 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm | 258 lb-ft @ 1500 rpm |
Horsepower | 290 hp @ 6200 rpm | 235 hp @ 5000 rpm |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
Fuel Economy | ||
MPG City | 22 | |
MPG Highway | 29 | |
Interior | ||
Seating Capacity | 7 | 5 |
Key Features | ||
Navigation System | Standard | |
Sunroof/Moonroof | Standard | |
Safety | ||
Front Crash Overall | 4 | 5 |
Side Crash Overall | 5 | 5 |
Dimensions & Capacity | ||
Cargo Space | 16.3 cu ft | 30.0 cu ft |
Curb Weight | 4268 lbs | 3915 lbs |
Height | 67.9 in | 66.1 in |
Length | 198.4 in | 189.6 in |
Width | 78.7 in | 74.9 in |
Wheelbase | 113.8 in | 112.5 in |
Maximum Payload | 1173 lbs | 2086 lbs |
Number of doors | 4 | 4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity | 3500 lbs | 1000 lbs |
By: CarGurus + AI
At CarGurus, our team of experienced automotive writers remain at the heart of our content operation, conducting hands-on car tests and writing insightful guides that are backed by years of industry experience. To complement this, we are harnessing AI to make our content offering more diverse and more helpful to shoppers than ever. To achieve this, our AI systems are based exclusively on CarGurus content, ratings and data, so that what we produce is both unique to CarGurus, and uniquely helpful to car shoppers.